(Officially Unofficial Documentation)
The Rizz Alignment Framework is a five-axis interpretive model for describing how someone comes across rather than who they are.
It does not measure morality, intelligence, attractiveness, or worth. It measures presentation, timing, restraint, and the side effects of being perceived.
All results are contingent.
All interpretations are unstable.
Repeated observation affects the system.
Each axis represents a tension, not a judgement. Movement along an axis is not inherently good or bad; it simply changes how actions are read by others.
This axis describes where behaviour appears to originate.
High performativity is not lying.
Low authenticity is not dishonesty.
This axis is about source, not truth.
This axis describes perceived force.
Power here is not aggression.
Harmlessness is not weakness.
This axis measures how much a person moves the room.
This axis describes alignment between intent, execution, and reception.
Cringe is not failure.
Based is not correctness.
This axis is extremely time- and audience-dependent.
This axis describes perceived friction.
High effort is not bad.
Low effort is not lazy.
This axis measures whether the effort shows.
This axis describes predictability.
Unhinged does not mean chaotic.
Calculated does not mean manipulative.
This axis reflects how visible the planning is.
Aura is not a score. Aura is a derivative phenomenon.
It emerges from:
Aura improves when left alone.
Aura degrades when optimised.
This is not a bug.
Re-taking the test does not invalidate previous results. It adds context.
Repeated checking introduces noise.
Repeated comparison introduces drift.
Obsessing over position destabilises the reading.
If your aura worsens after repeated engagement, that is working as designed.
Any visual representation of the alignment exists in a projected space.
No single view is canonical.
Your result means exactly what it says it means.
No more. No less.
It describes how a set of tendencies read when interpreted together, at a specific moment, under observation.
It does not describe who you are.
It does not describe who you should be.
It does not imply improvement, failure, or trajectory.
If you are looking for a verdict, there isn’t one.
If you are looking for a mirror, you already found it.
The result also means nothing.
Not because it is random, but because it is not authoritative.
It has no power unless you grant it some.
If you feel accurately described, that’s interesting.
If you feel misread, that’s also interesting.
If you feel the urge to argue with it, that reaction is part of the reading.
If you want to know what it “really” means, notice which parts you immediately accepted and which parts you rejected.
This framework is descriptive, not prescriptive.
It is not advice; medical, legal, or any other advice.
It is not diagnosis.
It is not self-help.
Do not attempt to maximise any axis.
Do not attempt to “fix” your result.
Do not attempt to farm aura.
The system has already noticed.